4K DLP projectors | Is it real 4K? (XPR technology explanation)

4K DLP projectors have been on the market for a long time now and are undoubtedly the most economical solution if one wants to live the experience of watching UHD HDR 10+ material in his personal home cinema.

The DLP manufacture companies the mention in the specs of these projectors that their resolution is 3,840X2160 but in fact they do not mention anywhere that this resolution is not the native resolution of the panel but is achieved mechanically by a device for doubling or quadrupling the pixels that has been installed between the DMD chip and the lens.

Marketing trick or indeed these projectors deliver the coveted 8 million pixels of UHD resolution on our screen so the companies are doing well and claim that these projectors are 4K?

Hmmm… very short answer, and you may save yourself from reading the rest of the article, no, these projectors are not 4K UHD projectors nor of course they are not giving UHD resolution to our screen. But we strangely see 4K… how is this done? Now you should read the rest of the article…



XPR technology

XPR technology is what has allowed the DLP projectors of the last years to be called 4K and advertised as 4K, it is the trick of Texas Instruments we would say to give 4K resolution to the manufacturers of DLP projectors while selling them the classic DMD chip with resolution 1920 × 1080 who has been manufacturing for 10 years now, good eh?

Let’s go straight to the point and find out how XPR technology works and many questions will be answered.

For reasons of economy we will deal only with the case of DLP projectors that wear the small 0.47″ DMD chip with resolution 1920X1080 and not those with 0.66″ with resolution 2716X1528. Of course the operation of the XPR system is identical in both cases so…

This is the famous DMD chip 0.47 ″


And these are the features that Texas Instruments announces in the official pdf of the chip


The resolution it announces is of course false since instead of 3840 × 2160 the specific chip without the XPR Module (which is a separate unit) gives a resolution of 1920 × 1080 of course.

Take a look at the refresh rate it announces which is 60Hz for 4K UHD and 240Hz for full HD, keep that in mind and let’s go see XPR.


The XPR module is a very simple device to conceive and consists of 2 main parts. The optical and the electromechanical part.

In the optical part we have a piece of specially processed glass so that it directs the beam of light that receives its call according to the horizontal and vertical axis.

In the electromechanical part we have 4 electromagnets coils that force this piece of glass to change position both in the horizontal and in the vertical axis.

In our example we will use the XPR Module XPR-25 from the Swiss company Optotune which is also the module used by Fengmi (Xiaomi) UST 4K projectors.


This is the module, at the bottom you can see one of the four electromagnet coils


The XPR module is placed just in front of the projector lens


The four electromagnets can move the optical part of the module in the vertical and in the horizontal axis, right and left, that is, up and down.


The way it works is as follows.

The DMD chip has about 2 million pixels since it has a resolution of 1920 × 1080 (= 2,073,600 pixels). To quadruple its pixels to yield the approximately 8 million UHD resolution (3840 × 2160 = 8,294,400 pixels) is impossible.

But it can increase its operating frequency so that it can play all the information with the existing 2 million pixels.

Thus, while each pixel can seemingly transfer 60 color information per second and display along with the other pixels the 60 frames of 1080 lines (1080p 60Hz), increasing its frequency to 240Hz, quadrupling it, then it can deliver four times color information within a second.

In essence, we take the 4K information and break it into 4 pieces, 2 million pixels each piece so that the full HD DMD chip (which has only 2 million pixels) can play it. Playing all 4 of these individual pieces 60 times each so a total of 240 times all together in one second, we managed to fit all the 4K information in just 2 million pixels!

We also wanted to quadruple the information from the beginning so that the UHD information could fit in one second, and we achieved this not by quadrupling the resolution, but the frequency of the pixels!

Well so far someone will say, but this quadrupled information will be played at the same 1920 × 1080 pixels so our image while basically will play all the UHD information, it will not have its resolution, our eye will not receive more pixels so in fact there will be no UHD display, correct!

Here comes the XPR module to provide a solution and allow these pixels to take a different position in the image within the same second so that as a final result our eye actually receives four times the resolution of that of the DMD chip, the coveted UHD resolution.


How is this done?

The XPR module in perfect communication with the DMD chip changes position in the pixel so that within these 240Hz it is in four different positions, 60 times in each position (for each part of the four that we broke the 4K information if you remember) . This cycle of pixel movement as shown in the photo below (top-right-bottom-again-again in its original position) is essentially 60 times per second (240Hz / 4 = 60Hz).


So the image that our eye will receive in a second will consist of 60 frames (60Hz) of this “cycle of pixels” and will also receive each pixel in four different positions.

So quadrupling the pixels we wanted from the beginning to achieve UHD resolution from a full HD chip, was actually achieved! It’s just that these 8 million pixels are not exist on our screen at the same time but with a small delay between them, so small delay that our eye can not distinguish it.


But even if we take for granted that these pixels are on our screen at the same time (since this is how we see them) another issue arises. Moving the pixel to these 4 different positions from the XPR module is done only by half a pixel and not whole pixel.

So if we want to capture it with cold mathematics of how many pixels our image actually consists of, we can only make the following simple addition based on the following photo that shows the positions taken by a single pixel.

One whole green pixel + half the blue pixel + half the light blue pixel + 1/4 the cyan pixel give us a total of 2 pixels and 1/4 of the pixel. So if we multiply 2,073,600 (which is the pixels of 1920 × 1080 resolution) by 2.25 (which are the pixels that finally appear on our screen) it gives us the result of 4,665,600 pixels and not the 8,294,400 pixels that constitute the UHD resolution.


That is, in essence, and with cold mathematical logic, the resolution that a 4K DLP projector with XPR finally displays on our screen is about half of 4K UHD resolution.

Respectively a DLP projector that uses the 0.66 ″ DMD chip with the highest resolution 2716 × 1528 (4,150,048) and uses the 2-position XPR module that moves each pixel by 3/4 diagonally achieves a resolution of 4,150,048 x 1.75 = 7,262,584 pixels. Clearly larger but again the 8,294,400 pixels of UHD resolution are not achieved.

So the bottom line is that these DLP projectors presented as 4K UHD resolution do not actually deliver UHD resolution, right?

Wrong! (And if i am about to drive you crazy and it all sounds complicated I’ll tell you this, yes, it ‘s complicated!)

Wrong, because in fact each pixel of these moving by the XPR module can be moved by only half a pixel as we explained above, but for a certain time it enjoys full display on our screen so it catches and sends to our eye the whole information it carries and not half as the math above indicates.

That is, while in essence such a 4K DLP projector typically does not provide UHD resolution, we in our eyes as a final result receive a UHD image from our screen. Did I confuse you even more? I know i did…


In these two photos you can see exactly what the XPR function looks like as a final result


In conclusion, XPR technology is the way texas instruments managed to deliver cheap 4K UHD DLP projectors to consumers.


Are there any disadvantages to this technology?

To begin with, i have to say that such a slight movement of a pixel requires tremendous precision in the assembly of an optician and very good quality of construction in order to give the maximum performance.

That is, there is a case from model to model and while using the same XPR module to find differences in clarity, resolution, contrast, etc.

Even the XPR module itself in its features reports accuracy +/- 8%.

8% error in moving a pixel is not a negligible amount in the end.

Also another disadvantage of this technology is that these projectors are forced to play always and everything at 4K60Hz, even if we supply them with 24Hz material (unlike the pixel shift from JVC for example which can and does work at 96Hz ( 24 x 4 = 96) for the 24Hz material)

An advantage in terms of the accuracy of moving pixels through XPR is gained by projectors that have proper and precise light management throughout the optical path.. These are mostly DLP projectors that have a laser light source or LED.

Finally, perhaps the most important drawback is that the 4K DLP projectors using the XPR module between the DMD chip and the lens can no longer manage well the light that we never want to reach our screen,  resulting in reduced of native contrast.

It is no coincidence that all 4K DLP projectors deliver half the contrast of full HD DLPs.


I also made a small video for you to see in practice how an XPR module works. Many questions may be answered once you watch it…


After all, are the manufacturers of these 4K DLP projectors telling us the truth that their resolution is 4K UHD?

Yes and no, that’s the answer…


Stay all health!


Nikos Tsolas


  1. Kristian says:

    I don’t know how/where to contact You guys,
    But it looks like a rigt place.
    I ovn old (but still good) InFocus in81, and thinking about changing it as it doesn’t my new apartment anymore.
    I’m thinking about changing it and getting some budget projector like OPTOMA UHD 30 or BENQ TK800M but I’m still not sure if those will be better than my old good in81.
    So my question is, are those (or other ones) new budget DLP projectors any better than my old fashion in81? Is there any sense to change it for new but budget one? Is new DLP chips used in budget projectors better than that old TI dark chip.
    Please answer me. I’ll appreciate all help and advise.
    I have around 1.5 t $ and still don’t know what to do.
    I need some projector to watch my movies (and sometimes play PS with my kids. Nothing more.
    Please help

  2. Marcö says:

    Thanks for the explanation. This supports what I was already thinking. I’ve returned a UHD30 projector because it appeared faulty, like the XPR module wasn’t moving. But when I see your ‘Beautiful Sea’ example, it reminds me how bad the end result can appear. To me, the 1080 image at top is sharper than the 4k image at bottom. Do we have to accept this perceived blurred image as normal? Are the blurred edges a feature of this technology? With a critical eye, I can’t perceive any difference between 4k on a UHD30 (the one I returned) and 1080p on a HD131xe.

    • Tsolas Nikos says:

      It is a long conversation. If you have a good 1080 projector the image is good, very good. But even on this XPR technology if you play a good 4K material the picture is also impressive and crispy. You can see the soft edges only if you try too. If you want my opinion, yes, a 1080 DLP projector is still worth.

  3. Kris says:

    Thx for this post! Must be one of the best resources I found on pixel-shifting with projectors.

  4. Cyber Piv says:

    Just a question : why the dY could not be of exactly (or very near) 1 pixel ?

  5. Jose Luis says:

    The explanation is very interesting, but I have a couple of questions to ask you:

    -When playing FHD (1080) content, can/should the XPR module be disabled?
    -How does the DLP chip (MEMS system) suffer in XPR mode in terms of durability increased by at least 4 times its duty cycles per second? With the new LED / Laser lighting system it will be the weak point, when before it was the lamp?

  6. Emad says:

    Indeed the best site explaining the way it works… But on another issue, I’ve been thinking and questioning the following idea… What would happen and is it possible at all to implement the the XPR with 4 axis movement on a 0,66″ DMD chip and recreate and even better image result?! Maybe something to experiment with for you, would love to see the result if at all possible!

  7. Barry says:

    I have one of these, an ls700-4k and the worst thing about this is that when one pixel goes out it impacts the 4k display as 4 pixels now out. 🙁

  8. David says:

    I am still the happy owner of a Hitachi LP-WU3500 wich has a 0,67″ 192×1200 dmd, 30000 contrst with HLD led light source. Completely dust tight module and 6 fans ( you hear them almost not whispering at 21db) With 24P material it is a fantastic razorsharp picture (it got an excellent review on projectorcentral). Xpr is also used on pocket projectors ( i had a vivitek qumi q8, xpr, terrible and very noisy picture ( if you looked directly at the screen you saw all the pixels dancing like ants.) Could not bear that terrible picture and sold the projector. So for me better 1080P than 4k xpr. A native 4k dlp would be so much better. And indeed the contrast values with xpr are terrible low.
    My advice is, if your full-HD projector has a good contrast, stick with it, because the xpr gimmick is not making it better.
    You can compare it with Digital camera’s too, the bigger the ccd the less noise, with a dmd it is the same, bigger mirors ( for the same resolution) is less noise and better contrast. Xpr is just a sales gimmick to me. (like digital zoom on a smartphone, but a smartphone is not a camera, it’s a phone).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *